ceemage: (Default)
[personal profile] ceemage
The proposals by the English Boundary Commission for Sunderland (and Tyne and Wear generally) are actually not too bad - unlike a previous draft where they had Sunderland split across 6 different seats. I feel the Washington seat goes rather too far inland, but the poor Commissioners have got to get enough people in to make quota from SOMEWHERE.

I am actually fairly kind to the Boundary Commissioners, since the rules they work under are more proscriptive these days, and they inevitably end up with "fixing X here breaks Y over there." Unlike, say, a certain friend of mine, who is quite prepared to tell the Northern Ireland Boundary Commissioners that they have "misdirected themselves." Both on a blog post and in an official comment.

Still waiting for the NI Boundary Commissioners to be told one day that they have 17½ seats to allocate, and they end up having to do a deal with their Scottish counterparts to create "Giant's Causeway Central."

In Hawaiian district re-apportionment jargon, this is known as a "canoe seat." Yes, Hawaiian district re-apportionment jargon *is* a thing, even if it's not as widely known as Thieves' Can't, or Polari..
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

ceemage: (Default)Peter Sullivan

May 2024

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 2nd, 2026 04:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios